public class MyOuter
{
public static class MyInner
{
public static void foo() { }
}
}
which statement, if placed in a class other than MyOuter or MyInner, instantiates an instance of the nested class?
Answer: A
MyInner is a static nested class, so it must be instantiated using the fully-scoped name of MyOuter.MyInner.
Option B is incorrect because it doesn't use the enclosing name in the new.
Option C is incorrect because it uses incorrect syntax. When you instantiate a nested class by invoking new on an instance of the enclosing class, you do not use the enclosing name. The difference between Option A and C is that Option C is calling new on an instance of the enclosing class rather than just new by itself.
Option D is incorrect because it doesn't use the enclosing class name in the variable declaration.
class Foo
{
class Bar{ }
}
class Test
{
public static void main (String [] args)
{
Foo f = new Foo();
/* Line 10: Missing statement ? */
}
}
which statement, inserted at line 10, creates an instance of Bar?
Answer: B
Option B is correct because the syntax is correct-using both names (the enclosing class and the inner class) in the reference declaration, then using a reference to the enclosing class to invoke new on the inner class.
Option A, C and D all use incorrect syntax. A is incorrect because it doesn't use a reference to the enclosing class, and also because it includes both names in the new.
C is incorrect because it doesn't use the enclosing class name in the reference variable declaration, and because the new syntax is wrong.
D is incorrect because it doesn't use the enclosing class name in the reference variable declaration.
Which constructs an anonymous inner class instance?
Answer: D
D is correct. It defines an anonymous inner class instance, which also means it creates an instance of that new anonymous class at the same time. The anonymous class is an implementer of the Runnable interface, so it must override the run() method of Runnable.
A is incorrect because it doesn't override the run() method, so it violates the rules of interface implementation.
B and C use incorrect syntax.
Which statement is true about a static nested class?
Answer: B
Option B is correct because a static nested class is not tied to an instance of the enclosing class, and thus can't access the nonstatic members of the class (just as a static method can't access nonstatic members of a class).
Option A is incorrect because static nested classes do not need (and can't use) a reference to an instance of the enclosing class.
Option C is incorrect because static nested classes can declare and define nonstatic members.
Option D is wrong because it just is. There's no rule that says an inner or nested class has to extend anything.
Which is true about a method-local inner class?
Answer: B
Option B is correct because a method-local inner class can be abstract, although it means a subclass of the inner class must be created if the abstract class is to be used (so an abstract method-local inner class is probably not useful).
Option A is incorrect because a method-local inner class does not have to be declared final (although it is legal to do so).
C and D are incorrect because a method-local inner class cannot be made public (remember-you cannot mark any local variables as public), or static.